The Yazidi Genocide According To International Law

 By: Yassir Qurbani 

The Yazidis are a religious and ethnic minority that emerged in the twelfth century. The Yazidis have been subjected to numerous crimes over the centuries, yet they have preserved their religious and ethnic identity, which is a mixture of Zoroastrianism, Manichaeism, and Islam. This identity has been characterized by resilience, despite having been a complex fabric that easily accepted external influences while forming. The most recent crimes against the Yazidis were committed by the extremist terrorist groups in 2014. Among these crimes, the most serious and widespread was genocide, evidenced by the presence of Yazidi mass graves. Genocide as an international crime cannot be established unless its elements are met; the objective and the subjective. As for the international element, it is included in the objective element, as the latter is a wide concept encompassing all that is material, And the international element is nothing but a set of material attributes that characterize the criminal act. As for the special intent, represented by the intention to destroy the group, in whole or in part, it is like any special intent, is nothing but a general intent encompassing the indirect consequence of the behavior rather than the direct one. Therefore, it cannot be said that there are two intentions for the crime, but rather one general intent, represented by the intent to destroy the group in whole or in part. And despite calls to try criminals before international courts that have subject-matter jurisdiction, or to establish special international courts for this purpose, no individuals have been tried before international courts for genocide or other international crimes committed against the Yazidis. They have, however, been tried nationally for the crime of genocide before courts of countries that punish this crime, such as France and Germany. They have also been tried in Iraq, but under the crime of terrorism, as Iraqi law does not recognize the crime of genocide.

Introduction

          Combating genocide, like any other crime, requires two stages of study. The first focuses on the conceptual aspect of the crime, as outlined by the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and further explored by the international criminal tribunals that have prosecuted the crime of genocide. The second stage involves applying the elements of the theoretical aspect to real-life cases to achieve the objectives sought from the theoretical aspect. This is achieved by studying each case individually. And the genocide against the Yazidis is a significant case that not only revealed the dimensions of the shortcomings in international and domestic legislation protecting minorities, but also alerted us to the failure of addressing the recurring crimes against this minority by shedding light on its history, which is structured around the dates of the crimes committed against them. When examining the unlawful behaviors committed against the Yazidis by extremist terrorist groups in 2014, we find that they, taken together, can almost be directly classified as genocide. This genocide not only caused human losses, but also deepened the trust gap between the Yazidis and other Iraqi communities. This is far more dangerous than genocide, as it paves the way for divisions and conflicts that threaten national unity and the social fabric of Iraq. This emphasizes the importance of protecting minorities in general, as they are an essential part of Iraqi society, and protecting the Yazidis in particular, as they are the primary target of this fabric.


The importance of the research

The research examines the Yazidi community and the genocide committed against them. Therefore, the importance of the research can be summarized as follows:

1- Finding and learning about the Yazidi identity through its roots, past, and present.

2- Reviewing the chronological history of crimes committed against the Yazidi community from its emergence to the present.

3- Presenting the results of international efforts, through the United Nations and international and quasi-international criminal courts, in developing the concept of the crime of genocide.

4- Discussing the legal aspects of the crime of genocide in general, and its distinctive legal aspects in particular, and the extent to which it can be reconsidered within traditional concepts of criminal law.

5-  Presenting a comprehensive review of the crimes committed against the Yazidis by extremist terrorist groups in 2014.

6- Examining the possibility of classifying these crimes as genocide and the theoretical challenges facing such classification.

7- Examining the possible international and local means of prosecuting those responsible for the crimes committed against the Yazidis.

 8- Reviewing the cases in which the accused were tried for the Yazidi genocide and drawing conclusions from the nature of these cases.

The question of the research

Several fundamental issues arise in classifying the crimes committed against the Yazidis by the terrorist groups as genocide. These include the extent to which the Yazidis could be classified as a protected group, given that until recently, some states treated them as a Muslim sect. Thus, it is not possible to consider the crimes committed against them as crimes based on race, ethnicity, or religion…. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the extent to which they constitute a permanent, stable, and distinct group. Furthermore, the requirement for the crime of genocide to include an international element raises the question of the extent to which the crimes committed against them between 2014 and 2017 include this element. Finally, the fact that these crimes are only the most recent case in a long chain dating back nearly a thousand years raises the urgent need to provide legal protection for minorities in general, and the Yazidis in particular, at both the international and domestic levels.


أحدث أقدم